|
Trial and error ensued Over
the years, I built, refined and installed a good number of prototypes
on different boats. With the help of friends and family, I
conducted sea trials and measured forces in various conditions (a great
excuse to go sailing!). We varied our testing accross many North
Carolina waters, both fresh and coastal, in addition to the Chesapeake
Bay. Sometimes these tests resulted in improvements to my design, while
others caused me to entirely scrap a design and hit the blackboard once
again.
Each refinement or new
design seemed to require more math and precision as the tolerances and
detail of the parts increased. I eventually began to do all my design
work on computer with a sophisticated CAD program, and I wore my
calculator out crunching numbers and formulas. I realized that I needed
to upgrade the equipment in the workshop to achieve the detail and
tolerances I needed. So, I raised the money and invested in a
combination milling and lathe machine, and the work and testing
continued.
Another requirement emerges At
one point, during an ocean trial, another boat broke a sound rudder
from heavy wave action to the beam while the wheel was lashed down, so
there needed to be a definite limit to the holding power that the
device applies to the helm. This decision added one more requirement to
my already long list:
12. Have a defined slip factor for rudder protection and to allow the helmsman to overpower it
During
later tests, especially on larger boats, I was surprised to learn that
people were using my prototypes often, even when plenty of crew were
available. When the wind was fair, and the chop was easy, we would trim
the sails close-hauled and just lock the helm. Different boats would
sail on very long tacks with little or no steering correction. Even
after rounding up in the big puffs, some boats would resume course as
well as, or better than, the helmsman would have done.
Another
surprise was the use of a tiller pilot on a larger test boat. These
little steering robots are great friends on long, multi-day voyages,
but they can be a bit noisy, drain the batteries, and often take time
to engage and adjust to hold a particular course. Although the
prototype and tiller pilot could not be engaged simultaneously, many
times we found ourselves quickly disengaging the tiller pilot and
engaging the prototype to deal with a bend in a channel, dodge a power
boat, or respond to a wind shift.
Throughout
the development process, my basic design concept evolved, sometimes
changing radically (and painfully). For a long time, each version was
an improvement, but fell short of my requirements or resulted in a
device too complex to manufacture. Eventually, I learned that the
design must evolve from one requiring many interworking parts to one
with few multifunctional parts. This change in design concept
simultaneously improved cost effectiveness and reliability for harsh
marine conditions.
Discovers the best design Eventually,
with yet another complete redesign, I knew I was onto something that
WaveFront, Inc. could produce and stand behind. Several refinements and
much testing later, the TillerClutch was borne.
We
wanted to ensure that every one sold works as well as our final
prototype. Because every part except the mounting screws must be
precisely custom made, WaveFront employs machine shops with advanced
equipment and technologies to produce our parts to exacting standards,
ensuring proper operation and durability.
I
am happy to see that I long to repeat my San Juan 21 trip to Cape
Lookout with the help of the TillerClutch. What a difference!
Pete Crawford Founder WaveFront, Inc.
|